I can remember as a youngster being very interested in dinosaurs and spending time collecting small miniatures of the more prominent types; one of my favorites being the Tyrannosaurus Rex. You can imagine my excitement when an imaginative movie producer decided to make a motion picture with prehistoric beasts and a T-Rex as characters (The Lost World, King Kong [the 1933 version], The Valley of Gwangi, etc.). They all seemed to have the same story line; how do men deal with 30 feet tall beasts with sharp teeth and a taste for human flesh? In this case truth may be stranger than fiction.
Imagine a primitive hunting party with hand crafted weapons out tracking a potential prey to feed a hungry family group. The prey of which they are in pursuit is a creature very familiar to the hunting party. They know the creature’s habits and have developed the skills to bring down their prey. An experienced tracker has been given the task of marking the trail for the remainder of the party who will devise the strategy to bag the prey. This scenario has been played out for ions in mans recent past and in times past our remembering. The Native Americans employed this method when hunting big game in North America. Obviously, while tracking the weary prey, the tracker himself will leave his own tracks along the path.
A similar scenario might involve a large group of lumbering four footed beasts with juvenile members fleeing a flood event across a shallow marsh flat of mud and reeds followed by a smaller group of predators in the same frenzied state fleeing the same flood event. Moving along with this stampeding sea of bestial flesh is a skilled tribe of native inhabitants staying clear of the dangers of such a stampeding mass while being all too aware of the need to escape the coming disaster; each individual in this story is leaving behind the evidence of this scene in the form of tracks in the soft mud through which they are traveling.
In each of the scenes described above, the tracks (if they are to be preserved) must be buried quickly and deeply before the effects of erosion obliterate them. Many of these paleo trackways have indeed been preserved thereby producing fossil trackways or ichnofossils. The study of fossil trackways and other trace fossils is none as paleoichnology. Ichnofossils, or trace fossils, differ from body fossils in that trace fossils are an indirect evidence of some sort of behavior as well as environmental condition relating to the formation of the trace fossil.
Many notable trackways exist in Africa, North America, and Australia. One of the more interesting sites is located near Glen Rose, Texas along the banks of the Paluxy River. In this area the Paluxy River cuts down into a geologic layer known as the Glen Rose Formation of limestone. The Glen Rose Formation is well known for its 50 or so known trackways of dinosaur footprints consisting mainly of sauropods (mostly plant eaters) and theropods (allosauroid type predator). The sauropods (the largest of the dinosaurs) are herding type reptilian creatures with some juveniles in the groups.
The first known discovery of the Glen Rose dinosaur footprints was made by a truant schoolboy named George Adams. While playing along the Wheeler Branch creek near the town of Glen Rose, Adams came upon some fossil three-toed tracks in the bed of the stream. He reported his find to his teacher who talked of the find with others. Eventually, the existence of the fossil trackways came to the attention of Ellis W. Shuler of Southern Methodist University who published three short articles about the dinosaur footprints found in the bed of the Paluxy River and its tributaries.
Interest in the Paluxy River dinosaur tracks was reignited in 1938 when well known fossil collectors Roland T. Bird and Barnum Brown from New York’s American Museum of Natural History came to Glen Rose to see and possibly collect the now notable dinosaur footprints. During the depression, men of the Glen Rose area had begun to carve replicas of the dinosaur footprints to sell to tourists. Bird had seen some of these carvings and was interested in examining the originals. Bird and Brown both verified the authenticity of the Paluxy River dinosaur footprints and eventually removed a portion of the now famous sauropod trackway S2 for display at the American Museum of Natural History where I have personally seen it. The scientific community accepts these Paluxy River trackways as being authentic dinosaur footprints. Many of them can be seen in the state park in Glen Rose, Texas.
The evolutionist’s claim that these fossil prints where gradually covered over thousands of years by sand as the mud hardened into limestone under an inland sea. Of course, everywhere we find these limestone deposits covered by sand with dinosaur fossils it’s under an inland sea. It seems like enough of these inland seas might just be one large sea like maybe a flood. The fact is that if the tracks are not covered quickly they will erode away.
Instead of a gradual event spanning ions of time, why not apply a catastrophic scenario in which these animals were retreating to higher ground to escape rapidly advancing flood waters. These flood waters eventually covered this area to such a depth that under water, sand laden, turbidity flows could have covered the dinosaur footprints with what we see today and have called the Paluxy Sand of the Fredericksburg Group. The thick layers of sand along with the deep flood waters provided the pressure that hardened the mud with the footprints into the Glen Rose limestone formation of today. In addition to the preserved tracks, paleontologists have found fossil bones of the sauropods in the Fredericksburg deposits.
The now famous fossil dinosaur tracks of the Paluxy River are the first known sauropod fossil tracks to have been documented and studied. In studying fossil tracks, the method of determining whether the imprecision was made in the mud by an animal or was a product of natural erosion or manmade activities is well documented. When a track or other imprecision is made in the soft mud, it produces laminar compression layers beneath the print that follow the contours of the imprecision. Carved prints and erosional features that appear like prints cut into the limestone do not have these laminar compression layers as reported by scientific observation; CT scans also reveal these conditions when studying authentic fossil tracks. CT scans of the fossil tracks of the Paluxy River reveal these laminar compression layers thereby indicating that they were made when the mud was soft and then was hardened by some preserving process.
While discussing the dinosaur tracks which are so well documented and studied in the Paluxy River basin we are confronted with the not so well known presence of what appear to be human foot prints in the same Glen Rose Formation as the dinosaur prints. While the local people of the Glen Rose area capitalized on the discovery of the dinosaur tracks, there were others who discovered what they believed to be human tracks along the Paluxy River. The same people who carved the dinosaur replica prints for sale in the Great Depression also carved replicas of the human looking prints they found as reported by Carl Baugh of Glen Rose.
In a museum near Glen Rose operated by Carl Baugh, a fossil human foot print with a theropod type dinosaur foot print claw cutting into it is on display (I have personally seen the print). The fossil print was found along the Paluxy River as verified by an impartial witness of TV newsmen and curious onlookers as well as a video camera recording logged and dated. The track was removed and became part of the collection. As has been stated, an imprint in mud causes laminar compression layers beneath the print which can be detected by CT scan and ground penetrating radar whereas a chiseled print does not have these laminar layers beneath it. The fossil human and dinosaur print combination, as revealed by CT scan, has these laminar layers which would lead to the logical conclusion that they were both made while the mud was still soft.
For evolutionists to accept this observed and collected specimen of fossil prints as authentic would mean that they would have to put aside their belief that some 60 millions of years of time separate the evolution of dinosaurs from that of man; in fact man and dinosaur lived together before the Great Flood of Noah. It would shake there already unsteady humanistic denial of God and bring them face to face with a conscience that they have tried to ignore. Evolutionary time, of which we have made mention, is a factor that must be measured in the millions, if not billions, of years in order to give evolution time to work it’s wonders of unpredictable, chance occurrences. Do you believe that a group of hard core humanistic evolutionists with solid reputations in the evolutionary community to defend would allow evidence of this nature to be published in a science journal or to be circulated publically without bias and with impartiality? The answer to this question is that they would not and, indeed, have not. They claim that the method of recovery was unscientific and not observed by the professional community of accepted scientists when in fact they were invited to come and refused. There are other natural observations that reveal a more accurate measure of the time that has elapsed in the natural scheme of things if they are examined impartially. The fact is that this is just one of a number of examples that still exist to be seen by those with eyes to see.
I have not written this article to instigate a debate between a Great Flood geologist like myself and the evolutionist community at large though I would be glad to engage in such a debate and have done so in the past. Such a debate seldom results in persuading the participants to adopt the opposing viewpoint. The truth of the Great Flood of Noah is in the stones for everyone to see. It is like pharaoh hardening his heart toward the truth of God’s power demonstrated in the ten plagues suffered by Egypt. The truth was there for everyone to see but they hardened their hearts toward God and suffered great loss. If the scoffers of today continue to harden their hearts against the true science of creation they will stand before God without excuse and God will proclaim, ‘depart from me all ye workers of inequity, I never knew you’. Dear God of us all have mercy on them.